Ukraine

Ukraine, collusion, corruption and Democrats. The elite media for the most part either dances around this subject or simply straight up lies about it, just ask CNN.

The challenge in reporting this story is that it is long and rather complex. How do I present this story to you so that you get it, while keeping it and simple enough so that readers do not just click away in frustration because of the length?

This is the problem with reporting on organized crime, as those who are best at it are very good at keeping it covered up and making their web of corruption a near impossible narrative for reporters and columnists to report on briefly.

So far, The Hill, Politico, Fox News, Epoch Times, Newsweek and the New York Times have been reporting bits of the story. Here we are going to try and spell it out using bullet points with links. For those who want the nitty-gritty details you will have plenty of reading at the links provided.

The Beginning

In 2014 Ukraine was led by a Russian stooge named Viktor Yanukovych. The United States helped foment a revolution in Ukraine and replaced said Russian stooge with a new government ran by and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk and President Petro Poroshenko (NOTE: In parliamentary systems their “President” is like the Secretary of State and the Prime Minister is more like our President).

Vice President Joe Biden and the Hillary Clinton State Department took point on the change of power in Ukraine. The Clinton’s, Biden’s and others saw a way to enrich themselves in the process and boy did they.

Prime Minister Yatsenyuk resigned in 2016 awash in corruption allegations for reasons in part listed below.

How did the Biden’s, Clinton’s and others in the Obama Administration enrich themselves from Ukraine?

The United States offered billions in loan guarantees to Ukraine in an effort to divorce itself from Russian capital and re-privatize it’s economy.

Vice President Biden and the State Department used its influence to get certain state run assets to certain wealthy oligarchs, such as Ukrainian Billionaire Victor Pinchuk, for bargain prices. In exchange, Biden, the Clinton’s and others would get a cut.

The Clinton’s got their cut through giving paid speeches in Ukraine and using the Clinton Foundation to launder donations. Victor Pinchuk and others who were friends of the Clinton State Department were heavy donors to the Clinton Foundation numbering in the tens of millions of dollars making Ukraine the top foreign contributor to the Clinton Foundation. Victor Pinchuk was even invited to have dinner with the Clinton’s at their home.

Vice President Biden got his cut via money sent to his son Hunter. Pinchuk’s political ally  Nikolai Zlochevsky put Hunter Biden on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company in which Hunter Biden received monthly payments of over $166,000.

This is the same tactic that Biden used to accept money from the Chinese. Shortly after a trip China by Vice President Biden, the Chinese National Bank entered into a $1.5 billion private equity partnership with Hunter Biden. Also included in the deal was Senator John Kerry’s stepson Chris Heinz, and Devon Archer. They partnered with the politically connected Thornton Group from Massachusetts. Thornton Group is run by James Bulger, nephew of famed mafia hit-man “Whitey” Bulger, of which we are all sure is a complete coincidence.

President Trump has said that Democrats have been too soft on China. Ya think? The Chinese have given illegal campaign money to the Clinton’s since the early 1990’s in exchange for secret military technology. Russian influence on American policy is dwarfed by the Chinese influence.

Getting back to Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, it seems that he spent millions getting the influence of the Clinton’s, Obama’s White House Lawyer Greg Craig, and others in getting the Obama Administration to help oust the pro-putin regime in Ukraine and replace it with a regime favorable to Obama, Biden and the Clinton’s going back at least as far as 2012. Part of that influence was in the creation of what is now knows as “The Ukrainian Report” which was written by Greg Craig and other allies of Victor Pinchuk that served to whitewash the corruption conviction of former anti-Putin Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, a political ally of Pinchuk.

Did those in the administration involved register as foreign lobbyists revealing that they were doing work for a foreign interest? Nope.

Democrats: Hey Ukraine, We Could Use a Favor or Two…..

Corruption in Ukraine is rampant and something beyond complicated. Ukraine has a special agency designed to fight corruption which Joe Biden had a hand in creating, meaning that they would make sure investigations stayed away from himself or his friends.

When the Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin began to look at corruption involving Burisma, and the payments made to Hunter Biden, Vice President Biden intervened personally. Via The Hill:

In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.

“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.

In January 2016 the Democratic National Committee reached out to Ukrainian officials, via the Ukrainian Embassy asking if they had any dirt on anyone close to Donald Trump. At this time the only person close to Trump who had done consulting in Ukraine was Paul Manafort, After a meeting at the Obama White House Ukrainian officials close to the Democrats spun that data to make it look as if Manafort was working for Vladimir Putin, which resulted in his resignation from the Trump Campaign.

According to reporting from Politico, which is a pro-Clinton news outlet, a Ukrainian/American veteran Democratic Party operative, named Alexandra Chalupa, was paid $412,000 to coordinate Trump opposition research. Chalupa “had developed a network of sources in Kiev and Washington, including investigative journalists, government officials and private intelligence operatives.” “Chalupa said the (Ukrainian) embassy also worked directly with reporters researching Trump, Manafort, and Russia, to point them in the right directions.” During the campaign several Ukrainian officials made public statements attacking Trump.

This was not some oddball Russian coming to someone close to Trump claiming to have dirt as Democrats have accused. This is the Democrats and the Obama White House going to the Ukrainian government asking for dirt and help advancing Clinton Campaign spin and talking points….and getting it. That’s collusion.

In December a Ukrainian court ruled that the country had wrongfully meddled in the American 2016 election.

Dem-Media Unhinged Reaction to “No Collusion” in Mueller Report

If one were to accept the “reporting” from CNN, MSNBC, and the Washington Press Corps in recent days, one might believe that the new Attorney General William Barr is a Russian spy, former “hero” Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein has gone over to the dark side, and that Robert Mueller went from being the righteous holy warrior against Trump to an insider who was part of the conspiracy to get President Trump off charges of treason with the Russian Government.

Meanwhile, other Democrats and elite media pundits are quietly dropping the Russian Treason conspiracy narrative and moving the goal post to “Trump obstructed justice” even though the Mueller Report makes it clear that there was no criminal attempt to do so.

The biggest talking point they have is that President Trump asked his lawyers to look into seeing if Robert Mueller should be fired. They say that Trump wanted Mueller fired in an effort to obstruct the investigation. The truth, as stated in the report, demonstrates that Trump wanted Mueller fired for rather obvious conflicts of interest such as:

1 – Mueller was a part of the CFIUS Committee that approved Hillary’s sale of uranium to Russia at Hillary’s behest.

2 – Mueller was FBI director during Hillary Clinton’s violations of the Espionage Act/Public Records Act illegal private unsecured email server use and cover-up while she was Secretary of State.

3 – Robert Mueller is James Comey’s best friend. They deny this now but even the Washington Post reports that they have been very close for many years.

4 – Mueller put together a team of arch partisans who hated Trump as revealed by their own text messages and emails that also reveal that their intention was to find Trump guilty as an insurance policy in case the American people chose incorrectly.

5 – Mueller knew that FBI/DoJ had lied in it’s filings with the FISA Court about the nature of the fake “Steel Dossier” in order to get approval to launch covert surveillance on Trump and his campaign.

6 – If the objective was to find out about Russian interference, why did Mueller not question under oath various Obama era officials who were in power when all this allegedly happened? A list including but not limited to James Clapper, James Brennan, Samantha Power, Andrew McCabe, and the former Attorney General? When House Democrat Adam Schiff said he had evidence of collusion why did Mueller not ask for the evidence?

Trump’s anger and frustration at the complete unfairness of the whole Russian collusion hoax is perfectly legitimate, which is why Kellyanne Conway has said as recently as yesterday that President Trump was well within constitutional legality to fire Mueller for these conflicts.

The Democrat’s game plan will be to spin President Trump’s defending himself, such as his comments on Twitter, as attempts to obstruct justice. If one is accused of treason, aren’t you going to defend yourself very aggressively? The Russian hoax didn’t start out as a legal investigation, it was a political opposition research and political dirty tricks campaign that was was perverted into a counter intelligence investigation by corrupt Obama Administration officials and then perverted into a criminal investigation by leftover Obama Administration officials in hopes of undoing the 2016 election.

Obstruction? President Trump did not assert executive privilege, plead the 5th Amendment, or resist subpoenas in anyway. Nor did President Trump prevent the Mueller Report from seeing the light of day, which is under his legal authority to do so.

Putting the shoe on the other foot, defending yourself is not obstruction, but wiping computers, taking hammers to hard drives and cell phones, deleting 30,000 subpoenaed emails, lying to Congress, and countless Obama and Clinton era officials pleading the 5th, or otherwise refusing to testify certainly is.




The videos above are typical of what has happened under countless investigations since the Clinton’s have been in public service, yet the Clinton’s don’t obstruct justice at all according to the elite media or most Democrats.

Upon examination of the Mueller Report some interesting observations come to mind.

The Mueller report states over and over that there was no Russian collusion with the Trump Campaign, yet leaks from Mueller’s staff for the last two years have been constantly leaking to the media that there was.

Leaked emails and text messages among Mueller’s top investigators show that they knew early on that there was no case for Russian collusion and right to the end Mueller was trying to question the President on something he knew never happened. No legit prosecutor would ever do this.

The 200 page report is largely filled with innuendo, hearsay and punditry that isn’t under oath; this guy said this and the other guy said that, most of it second or third hand, none of which has been challenged or cross examined. Essentially, it is a political document, not a legal one.

This is why it is not the DoJ’s job to create a political opposition research paper and disseminate it to the public. It is their job to bring real evidence to a jury or not.

How fair is it for a prosecutor to essentially accuse you of treason repeatedly when he full well knew better, to come up with no evidence that could withstand minimal cross examination, but then come out with a report that is half filled with innuendo and hearsay making it look like you did something wrong, but no one is sure exactly what?

This is why under normal proprietorial procedures there are rules such as “6E” that prevent this type of smear information and showboating from being allowed to happen.

Democrats such as Jarold Nadler say that they will sue to obtain the grand jury testimony, raw investigative data, documents etc. Proprietorial procedures and the secrecy involved are not just a matter of legal procedure, they are law. Democrats will bring their lawsuit and they will lose.

Let the counter investigation begin.

News Vets Ted Koppel, Lara Logan Are Latest To Call Out “Resistance” Media


Ted Koppel

Lara Logan

Never in our lifetimes have we seen all pretext of media objectivity or desire to report objective truth get tossed out the window as we have seen with the elite media today, including censorship of Republicans by YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Recently retired ABC News Anchor Ted Koppel, who is a liberal himself, called out journalists who associate themselves with “The Resistance”; Eric Trump also comments:

Brit Hume, who worked for Ted Koppel for many years, comments:

Legendary CBS News war correspondent Lara Logan had this to say during an extended interview with retired Navy Seal Mike Ritland:

Visually, anyone who’s ever been to Israel and been to the Wailing Wall has seen that the women have this tiny little spot in front of the wall to pray, and the rest of the wall is for the men. To me, that’s a great representation of the American media, is that in this tiny little corner where the women pray you’ve got Breitbart and Fox News and a few others, and from there on, you have CBS, ABC, NBC, Huffington Post, Politico, whatever, right? All of them. And that’s a problem for me, because even if it was reversed, if it was vastly mostly on the right, that would also be a problem for me.

lara-logan sharpOne ideological perspective on everything never leads to an open free diverse tolerant society. The more opinions and views … of everything that you have, the better off we all are. So creating one ideological position on everything throughout your universities, throughout academia, in school and college, in media, and everywhere else, that’s what concerns me. I don’t have to agree with everybody.

This is the problem that I have. There’s one Fox, and there’s many, many, many more organizations on the left. … The problem is the weight of all these organizations on one side of the political spectrum. When you turn on your computer, or you walk past the TV, or you see a newspaper headline in the grocery store If they’re all saying the same thing, the weight of that convinces you that it’s true. You don’t question it, because everyone is saying it. Unless you seek out Breitbart on your computer, you’re probably not even going to know what the other side is saying.

A Harvard study reveals that during President Trump’s first 100 days the networks had given him 98% negative coverage. A year later a Media Research Center showed that the network news coverage had remained 91% negative, with 63% of coverage relating to scandals, mostly the phony Russian collusion hoax which has 65% of Democrats believing that Russia hacked the election.

In the mean time CNN is blaming Donald Trump for a shooting in New Zealand carried out by a self described “Eco-Fascist” who clearly hates Trump and conservatives according to his “manifesto” (Original no longer available. Archive available here.) (2)

[EDITOR’S NOTE – There seems to be a coordinated effort to prevent people from reading the shooter’s rather nutty manifesto for themselves. Whole WordPress blogs, google references, and sites on various web hosters who have posted it have vanished. The elite media has been spinning to full out lying about the contents of said manifesto in order to attack President Trump. Fortunately there are web archive sites, like the one linked to above, that are dedicated to preserving web pages, in order to prevent just this type of censorship.]

What is most ironic is that the New Zealand shooter and President Trump have used the word “Invader” to describe people coming from the Middle East with intentions that are less than pure, and that is CNN’s tie-in that they keep bloviating about. However the shooter’s manifesto is filled with left wing rhetoric about anti-capitalism, socialism, workers (government) being put in charge of the means of production, etc. and has everything in common with Bernie Sanders, Hugo Chavez, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and nothing in common with Donald Trump.

In other news, Jemele Hill, former ESPN “Sports-Center” co-host and writer for The Atlantic tweeted a reference to assassinating the President. The elite media is hoping that you won’t notice that Democrat freshmen members of Congress are making grotesque antisemitic statements. Democrats have voted 19 times against protecting babies that are BORN ALIVE – MUM is the word on that.

Also, while the Russian Collusion hoax continues to go nowhere, corruption by the same bad actors in the FBI and DOJ who let Hillary off the hook have now admitted that they made a special deal with Hillary’s lawyers to make certain that the DOJ and FBI would never see much of the key evidence proving her multiple violations of the Espionage Act. Well, at least Fox News is reporting it.

Big tech is also working to actively sensor Republicans while engaging in wild double standards. Google Inc, who owns YouTube, has been censoring and demonetizing videos by Republicans and conservatives including the incredibly benign Prager University:

Recently leaked emails reveal the toxic political culture at Google. Leaked documents and whistle blowers at Facebook have revealed a systematic campaign of censoring and “deboosting” content from conservatives. The documents show that Facebook intends to influence the outcome of elections. Facebook said under oath in testimony to Congress that this wasn’t happening, but the evidence speaks otherwise.

Twitter has been banning and suspending conservatives for no reason, while often quoting or critiquing the antisemitic comments of certain Democrat Members of Congress. At the same time Twitter allows death threats and every sort of slime and filth thrown at conservatives and other non leftists. Left wing blue check marked accounts on Twitter call Jews like Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin “Nazi scum“ and all sorts of vile names that easily break terms of service, yet Twitter does nothing.

House Intelligence Committee member Devin Nunes is suing Twitter for the constant assault and smear campaign being waged against him. Twitter does not allow fake accounts, yet fake accounts claiming to be Nunes’ father, mother, friends, pets etc post vile lies, smears and personal attacks against him all day long. Twitter even goes so far as to promote these fake accounts as “accounts to follow” and still is at the time of this writing:

This week Reuters News admitted that for two years it sat on a story about former Texas Senate Candidate Robert “Beto” O’Rourke, you know that Irish guy, who pretends to be Latino, who was a member of a hacker group. Another part of his past criminal activities that are just coming to light.

At the time of this writing Judicial Watch has just received another 756 pages of Hillary Clinton’s emails with classified information that have been recovered from her illegal private email server, from which she did official government activities, as well as other activities, to avoid public records requests. These are emails that the State Department, FBI and, DOJ have been fighting in court to prevent being revealed. President Trump still faces massive bureaucratic and legal resistance from the “Deep State” bureaucrats.

For those of you who need a stem to stern refresher on the convergence of Fake News, Democrats and corrupt officials in the FBI, CIA and DOJ; Tucker Carslon does it as well as anyone. Watch and learn: